Blog

source

source

source

source

source

Home > City Services > Permits, Licenses + Inspections DirectoryThis page includes a list of all permits, inspections, and licenses required the city issues or requires.Overland Park reviews all commercial and residential construction plans and documents that require a building permit. Overland Park uses the 2018 International Building Codes package when reviewing building plans for commercial and residential projects. Learn more about building codes.You can apply for many permits through ePLACE, the City’s online permitting system.Follow the links below for more information about individual construction-related permits the City requires. For more information, contact the Plans Examiner of the Day at 913-895-6225.Follow the links below for more information about permits the city requires for pools and spas.Follow the link below for more information about permits the City requires for special events. Not all events will require these permits.Follow the links below for more information about permits the City requires for events. Not all events will require these permits.Follow the links below for more information about business permits the city requires. Not all events will require these permits. City Hall 8500 Santa Fe Drive Overland Park, KS 66212 913-895-6000 8 a.m.-5 p.m. Monday-FridaySee all our social media channels:Legal Disclosures source

As a department of the City of Austin, Austin Energy uses an independent, online tool to provide automated (machine) translations on our websites. As with any machine translation, context and accuracy cannot be guaranteed.If you experience difficulty with our translated text or need assistance, please call 512-494-9400 or 3-1-1 to speak with a representative. Thank you.Como departamento de la Ciudad de Austin, Austin Energy utiliza una herramienta en línea independiente para proporcionar traducciones automáticas en nuestros sitios web. Como cualquier traducción automática, no se puede garantizar el contexto y la precisión.Si tiene dificultades con nuestro texto traducido o necesita ayuda, llame al 512-494-9400 o al 3-1-1 para hablar con un representante. Gracias.作为Austin市的一个部门，Austin能源部使用独立的在线工具提供网站的自动（机器）翻译。与任何机器翻译一样，我们无法保证翻译准确无误并符合语境。如果您在使用我们的翻译文本时遇到困难或需要帮助，请致电512-494-9400或3-1-1告诉客服。谢谢。Là một bộ phận của Thành phố Austin, Austin Energy sử dụng một công cụ trực tuyến, độc lập để cung cấp các bản dịch tự động (máy tính) trên các trang web của chúng tôi. Như với bất kỳ bản dịch bằng máy nào, ngữ cảnh và độ chính xác không thể được đảm bảo.Nếu quý vị gặp khó khăn với văn bản đã dịch của chúng tôi hoặc cần được hỗ trợ. Vui lòng gọi số 512-494-9400 hoặc 3-1-1 để nói chuyện với một người đại diện. Xin cảm ơn quý vị.As a department of the City of Austin, Austin Energy uses an independent, online tool to provide automated (machine) translations on our websites. As with any machine translation, context and accuracy cannot be guaranteed.If you experience difficulty with our translated text or need assistance, please call 512-494-9400 or 3-1-1 to speak with a representative. Thank you.Como departamento de la Ciudad de Austin, Austin Energy utiliza una herramienta en línea independiente para proporcionar traducciones automáticas en nuestros sitios web. Como cualquier traducción automática, no se puede garantizar el contexto y la precisión.Si tiene dificultades con nuestro texto traducido o necesita ayuda, llame al 512-494-9400 o al 3-1-1 para hablar con un representante. Gracias.作为Austin市的一个部门，Austin能源部使用独立的在线工具提供网站的自动（机器）翻译。与任何机器翻译一样，我们无法保证翻译准确无误并符合语境。如果您在使用我们的翻译文本时遇到困难或需要帮助，请致电512-494-9400或3-1-1告诉客服。谢谢。Là một bộ phận của Thành phố Austin, Austin Energy sử dụng một công cụ trực tuyến, độc lập để cung cấp các bản dịch tự động (máy tính) trên các trang web của chúng tôi. Như với bất kỳ bản dịch bằng máy nào, ngữ cảnh và độ chính xác không thể được đảm bảo.Nếu quý vị gặp khó khăn với văn bản đã dịch của chúng tôi hoặc cần được hỗ trợ. Vui lòng gọi số 512-494-9400 hoặc 3-1-1 để nói chuyện với một người đại diện. Xin cảm ơn quý vị. The Electrical Service Planning Application (ESPA) is needed to obtain your permit and is also used by the design team to determine your power requirements. By signing the ESPA, Austin Energy signifies that it can provide the load, voltage, and type of infrastructure requested on the ESPA. Customers must provide the necessary infrastructure and follow all NEC codes and the Austin Energy Design Criteria. In addition, customers are required to check back regularly for any updates to the ESPA or Austin Energy Design Criteria to ensure the latest version of each request is submitted.  To better serve our customers, Austin Energy now accepts electric service requests for all projects in the Austin Energy electric service territory through an online submission request. This includes the Electric Service Planning Applications (ESPA). With this process, Austin Energy can manage requests based on submission date and project complexity and respond to customer requests for information more rapidly. Complete an Intake Request and attach the necessary documents from the What You Will Need section for your request. Be sure that you are the correct and knowledgeable person to submit this information. It is critical that the information is accurate so we can provide the correct infrastructure for your project.  After you submit an Intake Request to Austin Energy, you will receive an email confirmation. Austin Energy will then review your request to ensure all required information is complete before assigning your request for review and approval. Note: Austin Energy may request more information as needed. Submit your feedback directly to the ESD Team In addition to the ESPA, you may also be required to complete a commercial Electric Permitting Application for multi-metered commercial projects. You will need to include the completed form with the Building Plan Review package. Download the Commercial Electrical Permitting Application (pdf) If you have questions about our design criteria, purchasing specifications, or construction standards, contact one of our offices of Distribution Engineering listed below. AE Distribution Standards Email: AE Distribution Standards 512-505-7500 AE Design South – St. Elmo Service Center 4411-B Meinardus Drive (South of 969/MLK/Windsor Rd.) 512-505-7682 AE Design North – Kramer Lane Service Center 2412 Kramer Lane, Bldg. C (North of 969/MLK/Windsor Rd.) 512-505-7181 AE Network Design – Downtown 4411-B Meinardus Drive 512-505-7682 If you are unsure which Design office to contact, view the Austin Energy Service Territory Map (pdf) to determine which office supports your service area. For payment assistance with the AB+C portal, please visit City of Austin Contractor and Trade Permits. 512-494-9400 Outside Austin call toll-free: 888-340-6465VRS calls are accepted512-322-9100 source

Apply OnlineDownload Application (PDF)The Homeowner’s Electrical Permit may only be issued to homeowners performing basic electrical work without assistance from others. They must be listed as the homeowner of record on the deed, and live in the home in order to perform the work. Since incorrect/faulty wiring is the cause of many residential fires, it is important that homeowners planning to do their own electrical work have a basic knowledge of residential wiring principles. The city will inspect all of the homeowner’s work to ensure it complies with the current National Electrical Code and all applicable City Codes and Ordinances. If a large number of corrections need to be issued, the electrical supervisor may be called in to determine if the homeowner has the knowledge needed to complete the wiring. PDS may void the permit if it becomes clear the homeowner does not have the knowledge to complete the installation. Refunds are not available. The homeowner will be required to hire an electrical contractor to finish the job and pay a new permit fee. Download PDFDownload PDFHomeowners are entitled to four inspections: 1. Preliminary Conference (Mandatory) This mandatory inspection can help troubleshoot problems before you begin. Request prior to beginning work. 2. Rough-In / Permanent Service (Mandatory) Rough-in inspection: All conductors will be stripped and made up in boxes (outlets or switches should not be installed yet). Permanent Service: All conductors should be stripped and installed in the appropriate buss bars and if the mast goes through the roof, a 2” ridged or IMC conduit is required with u-bolt or guy kit. Underground work (raceway/wiring) may require an additional inspection, which will be provided at no charge. 3. Final Inspection (Mandatory) For the final inspection, all electrical equipment (i.e. switches, outlets and lights) should be installed, energized and in working order. Remove all obstructions in front of electrical equipment (i.e. furniture, boxes, etc.) so the inspector can access equipment and perform the inspection. 4. Correction Inspection (Inspector Determines) Correction inspections are used as needed to ensure items identified on a correction notice are addressed. Schedule an Electrical Inspection Call (208) 608-7070 to schedule an inspection. Contact your electrical inspector If you have questions about your specific project.sign up for our weekly e-newsletter. Thanks for filling out the form! Subscribe to our mailing list Zip Code * skip Submit © 2023 City of Boise. All rights reserved. Thank you your interest in the Building division. Please fill out the form below and a representative will be in touch with you. If you are inquiring about a specific project, please include the record number or project address. First Name Last Name Email Address Phone Number Message Recaptcha Submit Monday – Friday, 8 a.m. – 5 p.m.Closed Holidays source

Good day, climate compatriots. Neither snow nor rain nor heat can keep your faithful Protocol Climate team from delivering today’s newsletter. Of course, that’s the beauty of the internet, isn’t it? The Postal Service also delivers no matter the weather, but how its mail carriers will get packages to your mailbox is the subject of increasing rancor. Join us as we explore why the USPS refuses to electrify its fleet, and why basically everyone is mad about it. Can anything bring the Postal Service into the 21st century? Congress is mad at the Postal Service. The Environmental Protection Agency is mad at the Postal Service. Climate people are mad at the Postal Service. The drama puts the “Real Housewives” to shame. What’s getting everyone up in arms is the USPS’ steadfast refusal to completely electrify its new fleet of mail trucks. And unfortunately for the climate, basically nobody can force it to (save the courts, which, we’ll get there). The Postal Service is an independent agency, and there’s only so much that either the executive or legislative branches can do to make it go electric. So what’s an administration aiming to electrify its federal fleet by 2035 to do? To figure out what’s happening and what’s next, I spoke with two witnesses from a recent House Oversight Committee hearing about the USPS’ big electrification drama: Jill Naamane, acting director of the Government Accountability Office’s physical infrastructure team, and Joseph Britton, executive director of the Zero Emission Transportation Association. Turns out the electric USPS dream isn’t dead yet. Electrifying the Postal Service is a huge freaking deal. The existing 217,000 mostly ancient USPS trucks make up the largest share of the federal government’s civilian vehicle fleet. And the Postal Service has a plan to replace them. Just not with EVs. The agency has a contract with Oshkosh Defense to the tune of $11.3 billion for purchasing a so-called “next-generation delivery vehicle” fleet. It will entail “the single biggest tranche of vehicles that will be ordered in years,” Britton said. If those vehicles are gas-powered — as the majority are currently slated to be — it will lock in millions of metric tons of carbon emissions for years to come. Britton said that electrifying the USPS fleet is a “no-brainer” both because its routes are so limited in range (most cover just 20 miles in eight hours!) that most vehicles are unlikely to need nightly charging, and because regenerative braking is well-suited for the stop-start dynamic of delivering mail. In comparison, idling gas-powered delivery vehicles results in huge quantities of carbon dioxide emissions and air pollution: “Let’s say you’re on the road doing your postal route for eight hours straight; you’re only going 20 miles in eight hours. And so most of the day, [the truck] is just sitting and idling emissions into these communities,” he said. But the USPS has been stubborn, especially about the upfront costs of EVs. At Tuesday’s hearing, the USPS repeatedly cited the sticker shock and the “organizational and financial constraints” as reasons to not replace its entire fleet with EVs. The Postal Service says it simply does not have the money — $6.9 billion, per the agency’s own analysis — to do the electrification deed. This is despite the fact that the agency just received more than $100 billion in financial relief from Congress and has roughly $23 billion in cash on hand. Rep. Carolyn Maloney, the head of the Oversight Committee, said Tuesday that the USPS should simply spend the funds it already has, and that it needs to go back to the drawing board on its environmental assessment, cost estimate and agreement with Oshkosh. The agency’s response: “No.” (Well, it used more words than that, but that was its drift.) It’s true that the USPS has been in fairly dire financial straits in recent years owing to a byzantine set of circumstances put in place by a 2006 law. Naamane said she gets the Postal Service’s position, and said she doesn’t necessarily think it’s arguing against spending the money in bad faith. “They are definitely experiencing a lot of pressure from a lot of sides,” she said. Both Britton and Naamane are still baffled by the agency’s steadfast refusal to budge, given that evidence shows that switching to EVs would result in energy savings and lower maintenance costs in the long term. “My guess is there’s probably generic change aversion,” said Britton. “But they’re in a position that’s very, very hard to defend.” Naamane has questions about the USPS’ logic. In an effort to answer those questions, the GAO — which is the government’s main watchdog — is evaluating the USPS’ decision to primarily purchase gas-powered vehicles. During this process of trying to parse exactly what’s going on, Naamane said some of the USPS’ work “contradicts their own statements, or is clearly outdated.” Oops. Britton specified that the USPS seems to have relied on cost estimates for EVs, maintenance and charging infrastructure that are artificially high. The agency’s gas price estimates are also artificially low for decades to come, which, have you seen gas prices lately? The GAO report will likely be published by the end of this year, Naamane said. And it could add fuel to the EV fight. The USPS is holding strong, but the struggle is far from over. The USPS could just cave to pressure (and reality), redo its analysis and come to the blindingly obvious conclusion that EVs make the most financial sense. But we might have a negotiation on our hands. Democrats in Congress have made it clear that they are ready to provide the funding the Postal Service craves if absolutely necessary, but they are pressing the agency to “make sure there’s no other way that the Postal Service would be able to get this goal met,” Naamane said. A revised analysis could ultimately lower the estimated $6.9 billion price tag. Failing that, there’s nothing like a lawsuit to force an agency’s hand. A number of

Canary MediaColumnsPodcastsDaily newsletter 17 February 2022 What will it take to switch every home in America from fossil-fueled heating and cooking to electric heating and cooking?  Think tanks and government agencies tend to consider market incentives and efficiency mandates when trying to answer this question. Startups such as Sealed and BlocPower are raising millions of dollars of venture capital to support new electrification business models and financing structures. But the local contractors and customers on the front lines of electrifying homes have more practical concerns and questions. Can they get the latest models of heat pumps and induction stovetops from their distributors? Can the long-term health, comfort and cost benefits of these systems outweigh the higher upfront cost and complexity of installing them? And can their home’s electrical panels and breaker boxes handle the extra power loads without deal-breaking upgrade costs and complications?  These are the kinds of questions facing Craig Aaker, operations manager at GreenSavers, one of a handful of U.S. home-performance contractors that are taking the plunge into all-electric retrofits.  After a summer of record-shattering heat waves in GreenSavers’ Pacific Northwest service territory, it’s becoming easier to pitch his customers on heat pumps, which despite their name can work as both air conditioners and heaters, he said. ​“We tell people it’s the simplest and most effective way to be comfortable in every room in your house,” he said.  They also cost a lot less to operate over the long run than gas-powered furnaces, with any increases in electric bills well outweighed by reduced natural-gas bills, Aaker said. ​“Nobody’s ever complained that ​‘I did this and my bill went up.’”  That’s not to say that going all-electric is easy, though. One potential complicating issue when installing heat pumps or other electrical equipment is a home’s electrical panel. This is the central conduit for power flowing from a utility grid to individual household circuits. The panels tend to come in 60-amp, 100-amp and 200-amp configurations for most homes, with newer and larger homes generally having the higher-amperage, more state-of-the-art panels. Certain appliances — like heat pumps or clothes dryers with electrical resistance coils to boost heat output, or higher-voltage electric vehicle chargers — can add loads that exceed the limits of smaller panels, forcing homeowners to take on an expensive and time-consuming upgrade.  Most of GreenSavers’ customers don’t need to upgrade their electrical panels to handle the heat pumps that fit their needs, Aaker said. ​“I would say we’re able to successfully add [a heat pump] to a house more than 75 percent of the time without needing any modification.”  But that will likely change going forward. ​“As we move into this world where we have one or two car chargers and solar on the roof and…a heat pump, that house is going to need a panel upgrade almost every time,” he said. Even when electrical panels don’t need to be replaced, GreenSavers and similar services that are focused on home electrification are offering a more complicated and costly service than companies that will simply switch out older gas-fired furnaces or water heaters with similar updated models. “We’re trying to do this home-performance model in a world where we compete against single-purpose contractors,” Aaker said. To replace a gas-fired furnace with an electrical heat pump, ​“I have to stub out [cap] a gas line; I have to deal with an exhaust line I don’t need anymore; I need to figure out how to run all these refrigerant lines,” he said. It’s a challenging business to be in, according to Aaker: ​“It’s not easy for us to make money.” Meanwhile, the contractors that offer a replacement gas furnace can get it done within days or even hours and ​“can charge half as much and make way more money,” he said.  These are the kinds of on-the-ground complications that can make home electrification an uphill battle. Finding ways to surmount them will be vital to achieving the mass-market residential fuel-switching that study after study indicates is necessary to drive down U.S. carbon emissions fast enough to mitigate the worst impacts of climate change.  There are definite benefits afforded to homeowners who make the switch. Electric heating and cooking are safer and healthier than natural-gas-burning appliances, which cause harmful pollution both inside and outside homes. New all-electric homes also have lower lifetime operating costs than homes built to use electric and natural gas, even in cold climates, according to research from nonprofit organization RMI. (Canary Media is an independent affiliate of RMI.)  But retrofitting existing homes is a more complicated matter. According to a white paper from the Austin, Texas–based nonprofit research organization Pecan Street, one in four of the country’s 86 million single-family homes is fully electrified, leaving about 65 million that must transition from fossil fuels to electric-powered energy sources. And while a majority of homes have electric dryers and stoves, only 2 percent have an EV charger at home, and only 10 percent have two-way heat pumps (now the gold standard for efficient electric HVAC equipment, compared to the old-fashioned and inefficient resistance electric heating systems of yesteryear). EV chargers and heat pumps are two of the larger and more challenging sources of electricity demand to manage — and they’re both about to become much more common. According to Pecan Street, ​“these transitions will require millions of households to upgrade to higher-capacity electric panels” — 48 million of them, to be precise, or about three-quarters of the homes that await electrification. Those panel upgrades will cost between $1,000 and $5,000 on average, the white paper states, necessitating weeks of work with electricians and permitting authorities. Other experts project that the costs will be even higher, especially in parts of the country with more onerous permitting requirements, such as California.  Russell Unger, a principal with RMI’s building electrification initiative, doesn’t downplay the big-picture challenges for achieving full home electrification in the U.S. At the same time, he said, ​“It’s important to recognize that there’s enormous headroom for electrification. There’s an enormous [number] of households that can be electrified right now without any trouble.” Sean Armstrong, managing principal of California-based Redwood Energy, agreed. He’s been designing all-electric new homes and retrofits for the past 25 years, and